
Stalled Justice: Pennsylvanias Fierce Ambivalence
Two days after Christmas in 1979, John Lesko and Michael
Travaglia--both 21, drunk and stoned on amphetamines --set out on what
would come to be dubbed a ‘kill-for-thrill’
rampage with four dead in its wake. Their
savage violence stunned Western Pennsylvania and left four families
crippled by grief. Twenty-three
years later, both men languish prison, one in the solitary confinement on
Graterford Prison’s death row, the other, at least temporarily, among
the general population at Greene. They
emerge only occasionally, shackled at the wrists and ankles, to appear at
court proceedings.
None of their victims’ family members whom we were able to find has
let go of that grief, except for those now relieved of its burden by death
or Alzheimer’s disease. Some
family members still keep a wary watch on the killers and even schedule
time off from work to attend their appeals hearings.
Others keep a physical and emotional distance. Many who knew and loved these victims curse their killers and
wish them dead. Others are
reaching toward forgiveness.
Pennsylvania’s legal system reflects this mix of feelings about what
should happen to John Lesko and Michael Travaglia. Although Pennsylvania
juries readily return the death verdict, the appeals process just as often
uncovers procedural flaws and stalls the cases for decades. The result is a policy of stalled justice and wasted lives
that neither side of the death penalty debate would endorse.
Pennsylvania’s prisons hold 245 inmates on death row, a
number that ranks fourth in the nation. Yet, the state rarely executes.
Only three prisoners have died at the hands of the state since the
death penalty was reinstated here in 1978, and those three were
volunteers. That is, they had
terminated their appeals processes and asked to be executed.
The kill-for-thrill case of Lesko
and Travaglia serves as a good example of the Commonwealth’s deep
ambivalence. By now, these two men have spent more years on death row than
they spent of their short youth in freedom.
Graying, middle-aged and sober, they have each become men of deep
religious conviction, who bear little resemblance to the reckless 21 year
olds who had once declared themselves disciples of Satan.
The story of their killing spree and its aftermath is a tale of
heartbreak that never ends. Pennsylvania’s
policy of endless appeals reflects the state’s, and the nation’s,
fierce ambivalence about the death penalty. The result leaves the victims’ families unsettled and the
murderers poised endlessly at the gates of extinction.
Continue
Story...
|